May 2026

FORMAT +
FORMULATION

Six weeks of research. The fiber category has a lot of competition but everyone is doing different versions of the same thing. Nobody has combined a new format with a new formulation. That is the gap.

The product 2 gummies. 10g. Low-FODMAP.
Custom mold 6g goat silhouette
Formulation comps 7 brands
Format comps 14 brands
Updated May 4, 2026

Week of May 4 Overview

Total Tasks
23
Across 5 workstreams
Completed
7
Research + framework
In Motion
10
Active, waiting, or scheduled
Blocked
4
Waiting on quotes

What changed this week

Decision brief locked around two axes: format and formulation. Custom goat mold (2 gummies, 5g each, 10g per serving) is the commitment. Low-FODMAP is the differentiator. GOAT daily (gummy) is the business. GOAT pro (gummy + powder) is the commerce architecture. Competitive research expanded to 20+ brands across formulation and format. Key finding: Metamucil gummies use inulin, not psyllium. Even they compromised formulation for format. TopGum samples in hand as of May 3.

This week

Mark's quotes (6 variations) are due early this week. Actazin is hard to source. Anti-bloat path, serving size, and product strategy decisions all hinge on these numbers. TopGum R&D call (Jennifer + Yousef) week of May 11. La Libertad creative round ~May 16. Helios operating agreement, bank account, and entity registrations in progress.

The Thesis

Americans eat about 15g of fiber a day. The recommendation is 25-38g. That gap drives real health outcomes and has decades of peer-reviewed research behind it. The clinical evidence is stronger than protein, stronger than creatine, stronger than greens. The category should be massive. It is not.

The reason is the products. Metamucil is a powder from 1934. Capsules require 4-6 pills. Gummies exist but they all use high-FODMAP fibers that cause gas, bloating, and cramping. The supplements create the symptoms people are trying to avoid. Category dropout within 90 days is 60-70%.

Gap #1: Formulation
0
Low-FODMAP gummies on the market
Gap #2: Format
0
Gummies at 5g/unit (GOAT = 2x nearest)
Gap #3: Combined
0
Brands doing new format + new formulation

Modern fiber science versus 1934 fiber science

PHGG, acacia, and psyllium (pending benchtop). Three fibers, three mechanisms: bulk formation, slow fermentation, prebiotic activity. Metamucil does one. GOAT does three. Plus Actazin (kiwifruit enzyme, clinically studied for regularity) and ginger extract (clinically supported for bloating). Not your doctor's recommendation. But if your doctor told you to take fiber, this is what they would hand you.

The retention argument

Gruns hit 95% daily usage. That was the number Unilever bought for $1.2B. Not the brand, not the ingredient panel. Adherence. Subscription-first from day one. 2.3x LTV versus transactional. 3:1 LTV to CAC from launch. AG1 built the same engine. Gummies are the format people do not skip. But format alone does not hold. If the product bloats you, you stop. Low-FODMAP is not just a formulation decision. It is a retention decision.

Powder has a ceiling

Even in a stick pack, powder is still powder. It requires water, a glass, a counter, a routine. Compliance drops after 30 days because the format asks too much of the user. Metamucil has been selling the same powder for 90 years and still has a dropout problem. A stick pack is portable, but it is not a new format. It is the same format in a smaller bag. Nobody in this category has combined a new format with a new formulation. That is the gap.

Launch Timeline

Aggressive September 7 launch. Requires five things to go right: decisions this week (not next), benchtop in 2 weeks (not 3), pre-ordering powder raw materials before formula lock, QC overlapping with final production, and 3PL setup running in parallel. Powder at 12 weeks is non-negotiable. We compress everything around it. TopGum could accelerate gummies if their turnaround beats Mark's.

May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
W1
W2
W3
W4
W1
W2
W3
W4
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W1
W2
W3
W4
W1
Formulation
Quotes + decisions (same week)
May 5-9
Benchtop (fast-track 2 wks)
2 wks (need Mark priority)
Pre-order powder raw materials
Parallel with benchtop
Formula lock
May 26
Powder production (12 wks)
12 wks (long pole, raw materials ahead)
Gummy production (6-7 wks)
~7 wks (Mark or TopGum)
QC (overlap with final prod)
1.5 wks (compressed)
TopGum (Parallel)
Samples in hand + R&D call
Now
May 11
TopGum gummy production
Could be faster than Mark
Brand & Packaging
La Libertad creative
~May 16
Brand lock + packaging
4 wks total
Packaging print
2.5 wks
Website & Commerce
Site build + Shopify
After brand, parallel
Legal & Ops
Helios + entity + bank
In progress
3PL setup (parallel)
Parallel with prod
LAUNCH
SEP 7

Lead Times from Mark (IMN COGS Sheet)

Powder production (full turnkey)12 weeks (from Mark)
Capsule production (full turnkey)6-8 weeks (from Mark)
Gummy production~6-8 weeks (est., capsule proxy)
Custom mold fabrication (6g goat)~8 weeks (est., need from Mark)

Other Estimates

Benchtop samples (order to receive)~3 weeks (need from Mark)
Formula review + lock1-2 weeks
QC + release testing2 weeks
La Libertad review + revisions2-3 weeks
Packaging design final2 weeks
Packaging print run3 weeks
3PL / fulfillment setup3 weeks
Gummy MOQ (Intermountain)300,000 units
Full turnkey includesRaw materials, packaging, labels, 3P lab testing, master shippers
TopGum FOS platformFOS at 80-90% of 5g gummy
TopGum non-FOS base8-12 months development
TopGum samplesReceived May 3
TopGum R&D callWeek of May 11

September Requires Five Things to Go Right

1. Decisions this week (quotes land, decisions made by May 9). 2. Benchtop in 2 weeks (need Mark to prioritize, not his standard 3). 3. Pre-order powder raw materials before formula lock (fiber stack is locked, risk is low, saves 2-3 weeks on the 12-week clock). 4. QC overlaps with final production (start testing gummies while powder finishes). 5. 3PL setup runs parallel with production (not sequential). If any one of these slips, we are back to October.

Three Things to Confirm with Mark

1. Gummy production lead time (his sheet only lists capsules and powders). 2. Benchtop sample turnaround (not documented). 3. Custom mold fabrication time if going with goat silhouette. These three answers tighten or loosen the entire timeline.

TopGum: Parallel Gummy Track

Samples in hand as of May 3. R&D call with Jennifer Toomey and Yousef is week of May 11. TopGum's FOS platform puts FOS at 80-90% of a 5g gummy. Non-FOS base is 8-12 months. After the call, we'll know if they can run production on a timeline that competes with Mark's. Key question: can they hit a similar or faster turnaround than Intermountain on the gummy side?

Formulation Status

Two manufacturers are quoting. Intermountain Nutrition (domestic, Mark Harris) is quoting three powder and three gummy variations. TopGum (Israel, Phil DaSilva) received our target SFP and competitive matrix. The ingredient stack is locked. Everything that didn't work is dead and gone.

Task Owner Due Status Notes
Mark quotes (6 variations) Mark Harris May 5 Waiting 3 powder + 3 gummy. Actazin sourcing slowing it down.
Review quotes, pick anti-bloat path Michael May 7 Blocked Simethicone vs Actazin vs neither. Decision drives everything downstream.
6g mold feasibility + goat silhouette Mark Harris May 9 Waiting Custom goat shape. $20k upfront or volume commitment. 2 vs 4 gummies/serving.
Decide serving size: 2 vs 4 gummies Michael + Doug May 12 Blocked Depends on 6g mold feasibility and quote delta.
TopGum call: SFP review + paper formula Michael + Yousef May 12 Scheduled Jennifer Toomey (R&D) + Yousef. SFP and psyllium matrix sent. Samples in hand as of May 3.
Psyllium bench trial brief Michael May 14 Blocked 750mg to 2g escalating doses. After quotes settle. Both say it won't work, we want proof.
Benchtop samples ordered Mark Harris May 19 Not Started After quote approval and formulation lock. First physical product.
Product strategy: gummy + tub vs stick pack Michael + Doug May 9 Not Started Does the gummy become the portable format and powder stays tub only?

Ingredient Stack Locked

Primary fibers: psyllium husk, PHGG/Sunfiber, acacia. Anti-bloat: Actazin (kiwifruit extract) at 600mg clinical dose, 37% bloating improvement. Ginger extract for additional GI support. Dead: peppermint oil, TriBysn, CoreBiome, probiotics. No FOS, no inulin, no artificial sweeteners.

Psyllium in Gummy Remains the Big Challenge

Both manufacturers say psyllium doesn't work at high dose in a gummy. It gels and destroys the matrix. Seven Amazon brands are doing it at 750mg, but nobody's cracked it above that. We're pushing both to bench trial at escalating doses. If it fails, we still have a strong product with PHGG only.

Intermountain

Mark Harris (US Co-Packer)

Quoting 3 powder + 3 gummy variations. Current tooling: 3g mold, 4 gummies/serving. 6g mold gets to 2/serving. 300k gummy MOQ. Simethicone hard to source. Actazin suggested as alternative. Custom goat silhouette mold in discussion.

TopGum

Phil DaSilva + Jennifer Toomey (Israel)

Samples in hand as of May 3. R&D call week of May 11. Patented FOS-based platform: FOS is 80-90% of gummy, leaving under 1g usable space. Non-FOS base is 8-12 months. After the call, we'll know if they can run production on a timeline that competes with Mark's.

Brand & Design

Task Owner Due Status Notes
La Libertad: visual identity, logo, packaging La Libertad May 16 In Progress Back and forth this week. Next round in ~2 weeks. This unlocks website build.
Review creative directions with Doug Michael + Doug May 19 Not Started Doug weighs in on visual identity. Flagged in update email.
Final brand direction selected Michael + Doug May 26 Not Started Lock logo, color, typography, packaging direction.

La Libertad Deliverables (~May 16)

Visual identity directions, logo concepts, and packaging design. These assets unlock the website build in Base 44. Until they land, the site framework and prompt are ready but can't be generated.

Website Build

Task Owner Due Status Notes
Website framework written Michael May 1 Done 5 pages. Modeled on Gruns. Framework complete.
Base 44 prompt built Michael May 3 Done Ready to generate frontend.
Generate site build in Base 44 Michael May 19 Blocked Waiting on brand assets from La Libertad.
Site review and iteration Michael May 26 Not Started Mobile test, refine copy, product photography placeholder.
Shopify integration Michael Jun 9 Not Started Payment, subscription, checkout. After design lock.

Open Decisions

Four decisions pending. All downstream of Mark's quotes. Once we have numbers, these move within a week.

Anti-bloat path: Actazin vs simethicone vs neither

Drives cost, sourcing complexity, and marketing claims. Actazin is harder to source but clinically stronger.

After Quotes
Michael + Yousef

Serving size: 2 gummies ($20k mold) vs 4 gummies (no cost)

Custom goat silhouette in 6g mold = 2/serving. Standard 3g mold = 4/serving. Decision brief recommends custom mold: 2x dose per unit vs any competitor.

May 9-12
Michael + Doug

Product strategy: gummy + tub only, or keep stick pack?

Gummy is the portable format. Powder stays tub only as pro tier for AOV/LTV lift. Stick pack is the same format in a smaller bag, not a new format.

May 9
Michael + Doug

Starter pack: single SKU vs bundle vs protocol kit

GOAT daily (gummy) is the business. GOAT pro (gummy + powder) is the commerce architecture. How does the customer first experience the brand?

May 12
Michael + Doug

Competitive Landscape

The competitive set splits into two camps. Formulation competitors have real science but are stuck in powder. Format competitors solved for convenience but compromised on formulation. Nobody has done both.

Brands competing on formulation. They can deliver dose but they cannot deliver adherence. Most are powder. The science can be right and the format can still kill the business.

Brand Format Dose Fiber Type FODMAP Gap
Metamucil Powder 5-6g Psyllium LOW Format kills compliance
Konsyl Powder 6g Psyllium LOW Pharmacy brand, no DTC
ColonBroom Powder 3.6-7.2g Psyllium LOW Weight loss positioning
Loam Powder 10g PHGG + 5 prebiotic fibers LOW Dr. Karan Rajan. 10M followers. 40K waitlist. $45.
Supergut Powder/bar 6-15g PHGG + resistant starch LOW Strong on science. No gummy.
Benefiber Powder/gummy 3-6g Wheat dextrin LOW Legacy, underdosed gummy
GOAT Gummy 10g PHGG + acacia + psyllium LOW Formulation + format

Brands competing on format. Every gummy uses high-FODMAP fibers. Every one delivers a lower dose per unit than GOAT. Floura is the outlier on dose at 13-15g per bar, but still uses chicory root inulin.

Brand g/unit Serving Fiber Type FODMAP Notes
OLLY 2.5 5g / 2 FOS HIGH Mass retail, $14
Gruns ~2 6g / 3 Chicory root inulin HIGH Sold to Unilever, $1.2B
Sakara 3 6g / 2 FOS (beet) HIGH Wellness premium, $40
Metamucil 1.7 5g / 3 Inulin + corn fiber HIGH Dropped psyllium for gummy
Lemme No. 2 ~2 4g / 2 FOS HIGH Kardashian brand, $30
Nature Made ~2 5-6g / 3 FOS HIGH Mass retail, pharmacy
Vitafusion 2.5 5g / 2 Polydextrose MOD Mass retail, sugar-free
New Chapter 2 4-8g / 2-4 Agave inulin HIGH Organic, variable serving
O Positiv ~2 4g / 2 Chicory root inulin HIGH Women's wellness DTC
SmartyPants ~1 3g / 3 Inulin HIGH Multi + fiber combo
Midi Health 2.5 5g / 2 Soluble corn fiber MOD Women 40+, menopause, $55
Bellway 1.7 5g / 3 PHGG LOW Right fiber. Low dose per unit.
Floura bar 13-15g / 1 Chicory root inulin HIGH Jeni Britton (Jeni's Ice Cream). $36/10.
GOAT 5 10g / 2 PHGG + acacia + psyllium LOW Only low-FODMAP at clinical dose

*Psyllium in gummy pending bench trial. PHGG-only fallback still 2x the nearest competitor at clinical dose.

GOAT daily is the product. It is complete on its own. GOAT pro exists as a bundle tier for the consumer who wants clinical-level dosing at 25g.

GOAT daily GOAT pro
What it is 2 gummies Gummy + psyllium-forward powder
Fiber dose 10g 25g
Fiber blend PHGG + acacia + psyllium (pending) Gummy blend + psyllium powder
Format Custom goat mold, 5g per unit Gummy + tub
Role The product. Standalone. Complete. Bundle tier. AOV and LTV lift.

Fiber versus greens

AG1 is $600M+. Gruns sold for $1.2B in 30 months. Both built on the daily greens habit. Same consumer, same channel, same price range, same subscription model. Fiber has more clinical evidence than any greens blend on the market. The FDA allows health claims on fiber. It does not on greens powders. We are not asking the greens consumer to switch. We are showing them the gap in their stack.